The World is FlatBy: Thomas L. Friedman
Probably the most popular business/internet/global issues book of the last few years, The World is Flat has some very interesting ideas on just how small our world is getting. Lots of great interviews, lots of great information, and lots of great new takes on the world today.
So then why on Earth did I have to force myself not to scream every time I read the book?
I agree with nearly all of it's tenements about how the internet and all the new technology that has come from it has reshaped our world had such a drastic rate that we can't control it. (Personally, I think this is part of the reason we have hit this resession. We lost control.) So, yes, I believe the world is flat.
But goddamn, why did someone not find a better editor? I understand the man is a great reporter and columnist, but this book drove me crazy! While trying to down-to-earth speech, Friedman instead creates this wasted space and repetitive kind of talk. He adds in words to quotes that truly don't need it, often slightly changing their meaning and in many cases, not for the better of his argument. The phrase "The World is Flat" could have been said at least a thousand times less. And when he talks about himself, he continually reintroduces wasted space sentences that start to sound like a five year old babbling about his trip to the supermarket with mommy.
If a great editor, a real, olden day editor that actually knew how to write and create books, then this book would have been amazing and still have retained its down-to-earth quality. A snip here, a tuck there, and dear God, it would have Demi Moore bagging Ashton Kutcher. I wish editors were artists again, so that good books like this could actually be great books.
Otherwise, this good 650 page book is just 75% wasted space.





